> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:52:49PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> > Regarding the team unification, is there an expectation that the >> two-vote >> > approach will continue? I don't have a strong preference between the >> > ubuntu-release and motu-release approaches, but I think it would be >> strange >> > to be applying different procedures for different archive sections - >> or to >> > different members of the team! - so we should probably pick one... > >> I think it should go. IMO one of the main reasons to unify the teams is >> to >> simply the process for people trying to work through getting needed >> approvals. >> If we have two separate rule sets, we may as well keep it two teams (I'm >> not >> proposing we do this). > > I think the attached diff for FreezeExceptionProcess reflects the emerging > consensus. Are there any objections if I apply this to the wiki and send > out an updated freeze process mail to u-d-a? > > Are there any team delegations we want to have in place before sending out > the announcement? > It looks good to me. No objections.
WRT delegations: I think between Riddell and myself Kubuntu is already well covered. In the past I was the server team delegate for Universe, but the only purpose that served was to obviate the double ack rule. Since we're getting rid of that rule, I think there's no need. I woulnd't let getting delegation sorted out stop announcing thins. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
