On Tuesday 26 May 2015 16:43:04 Robie Basak wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Ok. In ubuntu vidid is already present new updated version 0.6.1. > > So updated package already exists in ubuntu. > > That's fine but you still need to follow the steps at [1], and you > still need: > > 1) A bug with an SRU justification that covers all parts of the > proposed diff between what is in Trusty and Utopic now and the > update you're proposing. If you want 0.6.1 rather than specific > cherry-picks from it, then that means you need an SRU justification > for all changes in the diff between 0.6 and 0.6.1 rather than the > specific cherry-picks from it. > > 2) Uploads for Trusty and Utopic (or proposed source packages or > debdiffs if you need sponsorship). These need to be based on the > existing packages in those releases. We can't just upload the version > in Vivid or Wily. Even if the contents are the same, the > debian/changelog file needs to be based on the one from the stable > release being updated, explain the reason for the update and refer > to the bug in my paragraph 1) above. The package version number > needs to be one suitable for the release it's going in to - see [2] > for examples. > > HTH, > > Robie > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure > [2] > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_pa > ckaging
I filled bug on launchpad, see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0xffff/+bug/1462602 -- Pali Rohár [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
