On Saturday 06 June 2015 11:33:14 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 26 May 2015 16:43:04 Robie Basak wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 03:51:31PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Ok. In ubuntu vidid is already present new updated version 0.6.1. > > > So updated package already exists in ubuntu. > > > > That's fine but you still need to follow the steps at [1], and you > > still need: > > > > 1) A bug with an SRU justification that covers all parts of the > > proposed diff between what is in Trusty and Utopic now and the > > update you're proposing. If you want 0.6.1 rather than specific > > cherry-picks from it, then that means you need an SRU justification > > for all changes in the diff between 0.6 and 0.6.1 rather than the > > specific cherry-picks from it. > > > > 2) Uploads for Trusty and Utopic (or proposed source packages or > > debdiffs if you need sponsorship). These need to be based on the > > existing packages in those releases. We can't just upload the version > > in Vivid or Wily. Even if the contents are the same, the > > debian/changelog file needs to be based on the one from the stable > > release being updated, explain the reason for the update and refer > > to the bug in my paragraph 1) above. The package version number > > needs to be one suitable for the release it's going in to - see [2] > > for examples. > > > > HTH, > > > > Robie > > > > [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure > > [2] > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/UpdatePreparation#Update_the_pa > > ckaging > > I filled bug on launchpad, see: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/0xffff/+bug/1462602 >
Hi, can you look at that bug report? -- Pali Rohár [email protected] -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
