On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Clem <[email protected]> wrote:
> I made a reply to the "Why no Browser in the core apps” thread about using > the same filetype as KeepassX, but didn't see Keepass mentioned here so I > thought it might be un related to the browser discussion. > > The .kdb file type is encrypted and requires a master password to open. > But is very secure and runs on all 3 desktop types and on Android. Perhaps > its not integrated into gnome-keyring or kwallet, but I always hated how > they both would always pop up asking for a unlocking password for simple > messaging tasks. Maybe it was just me, but always seemed cumbersome and > confusing. > If we are to use Keepass file format, why not use instead .kdbx (Keepass 2) files instead of .kdb (Keepass 1)? I am not sure which but in the page of Keepass <http://keepass.info/help/v2/version.html> it says the 2.0 file format has a lot more features. Keepass 2 is available to Linux as a mono program, with a mix of GPL-2/LGPL-2/MIT licenses. -- Cláudio "Patola" Sampaio IRC: ptl - Yahoo: patolaaa Campinas, SP - Brazil.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
