I didn't know it used mono (Ugh) with mixed licenses. But I knew the developer was coming out with a new version soon, so if the file type would be better suited to integration that would be fine. As long as my current file could be converted. Hundreds of passwords is a lot to transfer one by one. :-(
What new features does the kdbx file type add that would be a nice compliment to Ubuntu phone? "Cláudio Sampaio" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Clem <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> I made a reply to the "Why no Browser in the core apps” thread about >using >> the same filetype as KeepassX, but didn't see Keepass mentioned here >so I >> thought it might be un related to the browser discussion. >> >> The .kdb file type is encrypted and requires a master password to >open. >> But is very secure and runs on all 3 desktop types and on Android. >Perhaps >> its not integrated into gnome-keyring or kwallet, but I always hated >how >> they both would always pop up asking for a unlocking password for >simple >> messaging tasks. Maybe it was just me, but always seemed cumbersome >and >> confusing. >> > >If we are to use Keepass file format, why not use instead .kdbx >(Keepass 2) >files instead of .kdb (Keepass 1)? I am not sure which but in the page >of >Keepass <http://keepass.info/help/v2/version.html> it says the 2.0 file >format has a lot more features. > >Keepass 2 is available to Linux as a mono program, with a mix of >GPL-2/LGPL-2/MIT licenses. > >-- >Cláudio "Patola" Sampaio >IRC: ptl - Yahoo: patolaaa >Campinas, SP - Brazil.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
