On 21.09.2016 18:47, Guillaume F wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Le 21/09/2016 à 17:56, Michael Zanetti a écrit : >> This, apparently, turns out to be a operator requirement... I reported a >> bug about this when it first appeared in rc-proposed but it seems to be >> required by network operators to indicate if a SIM card is not present >> (it might be damaged and the system not recognizing it any more or >> something). > I could not find your bug report about this, but I found this one (1). I > understand the need to indicate there's no SIM card when there are no > SIM cards at all, but most people have only one, so to require to > constatly notify users that they don't have a second one seems a bit > silly. If anything, it's counter-productive: the user thinks there's > something wrong constantly, and the day something is really wrong, > he/she might not notice. > And anyway, this piece of information is already available when you pull > down the indicator. There's not much space in the top panel. How can a > network operator require something like that from independent OSes? > Can you provide a link to your bug? That way, you won't have to repeat > what has already been said there :). Thanks !
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-network/+bug/1607291 > > (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity8/+bug/1616342 > >> I think you definitely have a fair point about it being inverted on a >> tablet... It does not help there. On phone-sized devices though, it's >> not only about the dash button. all the other launcher icons are aligned >> at the bottom too, and I certainly use them a lot and would struggle >> more if they were on the top. >> >> Nevertheless, I'll bring this up again with designers, at least for the >> tablet use case I agree with you. > Yes, you're right, I overlooked the rest of the launcher… > > But having a different launcher for phone versus the rest might not be a > good idea, since (as far as I understand) Ubuntu does not want to > consider "form-factors". That's why I was wondering if it would not be > best to always have a bottom-up launcher… Would it introduce other > problems? Is it an interesting thing to ponder? > > > Guillaume >
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : email@example.com Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp