> Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: > It would still have to be released to the rolling release first, so I > don't see much changing here. Backporting takes effort, and I don't mean > pushing the packages but making them build on the LTS.
No. Where did I say that I want a rolling release and LTS versions? I said just a rolling release. Just one. And nothing else (i.e. no LTS versions). So all the work could go into one release, instead of into several releases. > Bryce Harrington <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=why+isn%27t+Ubuntu+a+rolling+release%3F Well, all this link is basically showing me is that many people would seem to be in favor of a rolling release. -- Ubuntu-x mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x
