On 04.05.2017 15:57, N. W. wrote: >> Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> So it'd just be a toy-distro for tinkerers. Like Debian unstable. I bet >> that'd work great for anyone trying to build products on it.. > > Could you please elaborate why exactly you choose Debian unstable as an > example in this case?
Because that's what I'm familiar with. Didn't mean to say it's a toy-distro itself, just too much of a moving target for anyone trying to make a product based on it. > You choose to use a distro branch which has the word "unstable" in it's name > for a "toy-distro" example, well done. If you prefer "sid" or "testing" then let's use those instead. > Debian unstable is not a rolling release distro. > > Arch Linux is a rolling release distro for example Fine, I still don't see Arch being used in shipping products. Sounds like you should be using it? >> Timo Aaltonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> this is the wrong forum for discussing it anyway > > Ah, I thought the Ubuntu X email list would be appropriate for discussing X > on Ubuntu. Must've been wrong it seems... Not for discussing general issues around ubuntu. > That being said: What place would be a better place then? ubuntu-devel for instance, but this has been discussed there already a few years back and shot down. Good luck. -- t -- Ubuntu-x mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-x
