On 09/16/2016 07:30 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > On 09/16/2016 06:59 PM, Angelos Tzotsos wrote: >> +1 to renaming testing to experimental. >> >> On 09/16/2016 04:23 PM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote: >>> I'm in favor of removing testing and adding "experimental" instead. >>> >>> This is closer to the actual way we use the ppa. > > Since the three active administrators of the UbuntuGIS PPAs agree this > is the way to go I've acted upon this consensus. > > Because PPA URLs cannot be renamed, only the display name changed, I've > created a new ubuntugis-experimental PPA. A dependency on > ubuntugis-unstable has been added to mirror how experimental is an > overlay of unstable in Debian. And the dependency has been removed from > the ubuntugis-testing PPA. > > All existing binary packages from the testing PPA have been copied to > the experimental PPA, and removed from the testing PPA. Because the size > of the new PPA is the default 2 GB which is exceeded by the packages > from the testing PPA, I've requested it to be increased to 8 GB to match > the other PPAs: > > https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/397503
I just received the following: " Your question #397503 on Launchpad itself changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/397503 Status: Open => Answered William Grant proposed the following answer: Done. " The package totals for ubuntugis-experimental look good now: Number of packages: 89 source packages (564.2 MiB) 837 binary packages (2.1 GiB) Repository size: 2.7 GiB (33.57%) of 8.0 GiB Kind Regards, Bas -- GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1 Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1 _______________________________________________ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki