On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Good idea.
Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now?
Not particularly. The only issue is that someone out there might try to
push to the 'nptl' branch, and it would fail/break. Pretty much a
non-issue now. I'll do the rename.
On 11/23/2009 01:29 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
IIRC, yes, ... all the code for cancellation handling is not yet merged.
This is basically the only part deeply interleaved with not NPTL code,
all NPTL/TLS/futexes are more self-contained.
Austin, could you confirm ?
No, all that code (at least all that was in nptl to begin with), is
already in nptl_merge. You can look at commit 57e882354.
http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?h=nptl_merge&id=57e882354
Do you have more that should be added?
Although I think you misunderstood his question. I think he was just
asking if we could rename the awkward nptl_merge to nptl.
-Austin
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
