-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Austin Foxley wrote: > > On 11/23/2009 01:23 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> Good idea. >>> Is there something preventing a rename of nptl_merge -> nptl now? > > Not particularly. The only issue is that someone out there might try to > push to the 'nptl' branch, and it would fail/break. Pretty much a > non-issue now. I'll do the rename. > > On 11/23/2009 01:29 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> IIRC, yes, ... all the code for cancellation handling is not yet merged. >> This is basically the only part deeply interleaved with not NPTL code, >> all NPTL/TLS/futexes are more self-contained. >> >> Austin, could you confirm ? > > No, all that code (at least all that was in nptl to begin with), is > already in nptl_merge. You can look at commit 57e882354. > http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?h=nptl_merge&id=57e882354 >
ok, I missed this. Fine for me. > Do you have more that should be added? > Few fix in TLS code, I'll commit later. > Although I think you misunderstood his question. I think he was just > asking if we could rename the awkward nptl_merge to nptl. > No, I understood the question. I'm ok with renaming. > -Austin > Carmelo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAksKuyUACgkQoRq/3BrK1s/ApwCggIkmLRYJb06GOm29Z4Y7TJPN bekAoLV3sLlxEd/FjakCGbKMaOh6kX3n =A/9R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
