On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:10:16PM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote: >> I'm not convinced it is actually that important to have the weak >> behaviour of _stdio_init, for a number of reasons:
> Hello, > > I do have a complete system that does not use stdio. >For various reasons, I'm switching over to uClibc. > I'm currently bulding an initramfs with static binaries for an embedded >device. (I'm not using busybox for now, although that could change.) > > I would very much appreciate NOT pulling in stdio into said binaries. please try the workaround (it's not really our bug but in the toolchain) from bugs.uclibc.org/1033 it should have the desired effect for all. > Pulling in stuff people don't need is going the way of the glibc, and >the uClibc FAQ explicitly claims that uClibc does things differently. > Please make sure it keeps living up to that claim. Please do not be >careless. Be assured that we will not instroduce bloat, in contrast, we continue to cut down on it. _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
