On 12/01/11 17:50, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > I noticed that almost exactly a year ago Carmelo Amoroso posted stating > that he hoped to do more work on backtrace. After looking at > libubactrace/sh/backtrace.c, I'm confused as to why this is platform > dependant code. The code appears to ONLY use library calls that should > be available on _any_ platform. I have copied the code to a mips > subdirectory and am testing at the moment, but I'm curious as to what > potential problems I'll find; due to my wealth of knowledge of backtrace > (that would be 0) I'm sure I don't know why this would not work. > > If you have any information, please enlighten me! > > Thanks, > Andy
Hi Andy, likely you are right and the current sh implementation can be widely used. Let me a few time to review this code. In the meanwhile you're feedback with your try n mips would be helpful. Cheers, Carmelo > _______________________________________________ > uClibc mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
