> On 12/01/11 17:50, ANDY KENNEDY wrote: > > I noticed that almost exactly a year ago Carmelo Amoroso posted > stating > > that he hoped to do more work on backtrace. After looking at > > libubactrace/sh/backtrace.c, I'm confused as to why this is platform > > dependant code. The code appears to ONLY use library calls that > should > > be available on _any_ platform. I have copied the code to a mips > > subdirectory and am testing at the moment, but I'm curious as to what > > potential problems I'll find; due to my wealth of knowledge of > backtrace > > (that would be 0) I'm sure I don't know why this would not work. > > > > If you have any information, please enlighten me! > > > > Thanks, > > Andy > > Hi Andy, > likely you are right and the current sh implementation can be widely > used. > Let me a few time to review this code. > In the meanwhile you're feedback with your try n mips would be helpful.
It failed. The message was that I needed to have mips specific code to include backtrace support. I worked around the issue by rolling back the version of the package I was attempting to use. If I get time I'll attempt it again. Andy _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
