On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >>>> >>>> it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a fast >>>> forward. it isn't an actual "commit" ... >>> >>> right. I think its set of prelink changes that I am looking at. That >>> merge commit is the data point I have >>> I was looking for Carmelo has seen something similar. I can provide >>> the two root file systems >>> built with and without that merge commit. >>> >> >> khem, >> are you able to reproduce the failure with a simpler test case ? it >> would be the best. >> > > I am trying to get to it. but its a full X system that comes up but > fonts are wrong. > it will definitely take some time since it has to be debugged all way through > I am not an X expert either :) >
are you running with prelink disabled ? w/o prelink, the only part impacted is in the symbol lookup process, but it were broken, nothing would work. carmelo >> >>>> -mike >>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
