On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>>>>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >>>>>> >>>>>> it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a >>>>>> fast >>>>>> forward. it isn't an actual "commit" ... >>>>> >>>>> right. I think its set of prelink changes that I am looking at. That >>>>> merge commit is the data point I have >>>>> I was looking for Carmelo has seen something similar. I can provide >>>>> the two root file systems >>>>> built with and without that merge commit. >>>>> >>>> >>>> khem, >>>> are you able to reproduce the failure with a simpler test case ? it >>>> would be the best. >>>> >>> >>> I am trying to get to it. but its a full X system that comes up but >>> fonts are wrong. >>> it will definitely take some time since it has to be debugged all way >>> through >>> I am not an X expert either :) >>> >> >> are you running with prelink disabled ? > > yes LDSO_PRELINK_SUPPORT and even LDSO_STANDALONE_SUPPORT are not set > same .config works if I revert back the prelink changes. >
Hi Khem have you tried with the patch [PATCH] ldso: invoke elf_machine_relocations in any case could you list the commits you have reverted ? it will help me a lot in debugging. Thanks, Carmelo >> w/o prelink, the only part impacted is in the symbol lookup process, but >> it were broken, nothing would work. >> >> carmelo >> >>>> >>>>>> -mike >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
