On 30/11/2011 22.44, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On 29/11/2011 17.18, Khem Raj wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On 28/11/2011 18.33, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:21 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On 28/11/2011 3.15, Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday 26 November 2011 19:07:44 Khem Raj wrote: >>>>>>>>> If I build the root file system without this patch everything works >>>>>>>>> as expected. Could you explain why this commit is needed ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> it's a merge commit that happens when you merge a branch that isn't a >>>>>>>> fast >>>>>>>> forward. it isn't an actual "commit" ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> right. I think its set of prelink changes that I am looking at. That >>>>>>> merge commit is the data point I have >>>>>>> I was looking for Carmelo has seen something similar. I can provide >>>>>>> the two root file systems >>>>>>> built with and without that merge commit. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> khem, >>>>>> are you able to reproduce the failure with a simpler test case ? it >>>>>> would be the best. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to get to it. but its a full X system that comes up but >>>>> fonts are wrong. >>>>> it will definitely take some time since it has to be debugged all way >>>>> through >>>>> I am not an X expert either :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> are you running with prelink disabled ? >>> >>> yes LDSO_PRELINK_SUPPORT and even LDSO_STANDALONE_SUPPORT are not set >>> same .config works if I revert back the prelink changes. >>> >> >> Hi Khem >> have you tried with the patch >> [PATCH] ldso: invoke elf_machine_relocations in any case >> >> could you list the commits you have reverted ? it will help me a lot in >> debugging. > > yes I tried the elf_machine_relocations patch and it did not help
:-( > I am at 7682323a3a798d6f15708f228f859a64cb869aa3 > which is merge commit. > ok. Filippo has already some fix to do in !prelink path. we are working on this. I'll keep you posted. Carmelo >> >> Thanks, >> Carmelo >> >>>> w/o prelink, the only part impacted is in the symbol lookup process, but >>>> it were broken, nothing would work. >>>> >>>> carmelo >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> -mike >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
