On (23/01/12 19:26), Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Folks,
> I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of
> kernel_types.h, any idea ?

I dont think so.

> 
> thanks,
> carmelo
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

-- 
-Khem
_______________________________________________
uClibc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc

Reply via email to