On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:17:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2012 13:26:44 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of > > kernel_types.h, any idea ? > > the alternative is ... ? relying on linux/types.h ? if we don't care about > things older than like linux-2.6.18, then we prob can drop kernel_types.h. > but i suspect some people do care about older targets.
For the record, I happen to care. Compiling for Linux 2.4.19. Regards, Rune _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
