On 24/01/2012 3.17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 23 January 2012 13:26:44 Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >> I'm wondering if we do still need to have in uclibc a version of >> kernel_types.h, any idea ? > > the alternative is ... ? relying on linux/types.h ?
linux/posix_types.h for example > if we don't care about things older than like linux-2.6.18, then we > prob can drop kernel_types.h. but i suspect some people do care > about older targets. > -mike _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
