Hi,
-- Doug Kehn wrote:
>What MIB object(s) are you GETting? I've used net-snmp 5.2.1 with both
>linux->2.4.x and linux-2.6.x with no alarming differences. (Of course my
>platform is >different.)
For my tests, I did it on sysObjectID parameter of MIB-II.
Can you tell me which results about time response do you have on yours plaforms?
-- Doug Kehn wrote:
>I assume you are using the same SNMP protocol version (i.e. SNMP V2) for
>>comparison?
Yes, I did it.
And the SNMP protocol version is SNMP V1.
Moreover, I saw that my snmp server (net-snmp whatever version) can respond
sometimes in less 10 ms (like my another platform with 2.4.x).
Has anybody an idea why performances of net-snmp between 2.6.x and 2.4.x are
different, please?
I posted my problem on net-snmp list. And net-snmp list answered:
« You really need to explore your options to do profiling on the embedded
system. »
With my platform (based on MCF5328 ucLinux-dist-20070130 distribution linux
2.6.19), is -it possible to profile a process (here for instance, snmpd) on
uClinux in order to use gprof?
If yes, how to do?
Thanks for your advices
Cedric
_______________________________________________
uClinux-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by [email protected]
To unsubscribe see:
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/options/uclinux-dev
