2013/4/15 andrea antonello <andrea.antone...@gmail.com> > Hi guys, > I tried to checkout the locationtech_ip branch and run the mvn libs > download. > > But I am having a ton of problems due to wrong itext libs and missing > easymocks and similar. >
OK, You've got me there. Right now the build can be done in maven mode only (see orbit dependencies). I started creating a target file which we can use for the maven build itself and for Eclipse IDE as well but haven't finished yet. This is because TYCHO is much more efficient to resolve dependencies than the target file editor in eclipse is. I have problems with the language_feature that requires other fixed versions (for nl fragments instead of using version ranges) However, you can start taking the following target file https://github.com/fgdrf/udig-platform/blob/dep_cleanup/targets/indigo/indigo.target (sorry, no guarantee that it would work at the moment) > Is the current branch supposed to work from eclipse? It can be me that > lost some of the latest news and upgrades, if so, I apologize in > advance. > My fault to write up a summary ;) > > I was trying because I am a bit worried about the removal of the WMT > jars and stuff. Are you also trying the tiles loading of OSM to see if > those can really be removed. I remember having downsized a lot the > plugins and libs related to that, but I am not sure if everything can > be removed right away now. > I guess I didn't got your point. You mean OSM Tiles implementations requires MQ-classes? I just removed the mq.jar and relevant classes that used classes from mq-lib: https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/commit/d82735b4ad3f1c89562780523c536dfd06541b18 (see line 241 : https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/commit/d82735b4ad3f1c89562780523c536dfd06541b18#L241) the mapQuest feature was not available at all ;) > Cheers, > Andrea > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Jody Garnett <jody.garn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > IMHO Andrea can commit into locationtech_ip to solve LocationTech IP > > relevant issues. > > > > Agreed, that is what it is for. > > > > > > @Jody Same with geotools upgrade. I would suggest to accept the pull > request > > and commit it into master branch. Afterwards we can merge it into > > locationtech_ip to have the right geotools jars to review for the CQ > > https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7142 > > > > I am going to hold off on that until we figure out how much effort it > will > > be to: > > a) make an initial request for GeoTools 9.0-M0 jars > > b) make a subsequent request for GeoTools 9.1 jars (I think it may less > > effort?) > > > > Opinions? Move on on IRC channel? > > > > Sure. > > Jody > > > _______________________________________________ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel >
_______________________________________________ User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) http://udig.refractions.net http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
