Udi Fuchs píše v So 12. 09. 2009 v 21:43 -0500: > Before we start having pizzas flying around the globe, we should try > to make an informed decision of which sharpening we should use. Is > there a reason why dlraw has both usm and refocus? > While I originally (half year ago?) preferred also some of the advanced algorithms, now I would vote for the well known USM only.
The reason being that x the images, wich are worth it, are usually finalised in the image editor anyway - and it has the refocus/... already. x it is usefull to have a cropped area of 100 % - 200 % zoom for preview x "precise" sharpening is done on the image of the final resolution (web, printing) regards Milan Knizek knizek (dot) confy (at) volny (dot) cz http://www.milan-knizek.net - About linux and photography (Czech language only) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list ufraw-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
