On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 07:54:37PM +0100, Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > Considering the other replies, I think we're pretty much agreed on > USM, mostly because of it's versatility and maturity.
Refocus gets much better results, which makes sense since the deconvolution method actually has a sound mathematical grounding, rather than unsharp masking which is a hack whose only methodological basis is that you can actually implement it with transparencies in a darkroom. That said, at the end of the day it's an aesthetic decision and there are also speed advantages to the more primitive methods. So I don't see why it's necessary to restrict ourselves to a single method. DigiKam and other packages offer multiple sharpening algorithms, and I think this is the right approach. Of course, the first job is to add at least one. > My Port-For-A-Pizza(tm) offer is still valid :) Tempting. :-) Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ ufraw-devel mailing list ufraw-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ufraw-devel
