Emmy,
   
  These people simply cannot live in peace in the Dr. Cong, Rwanda, and 
Burundi. The only country they think is safe for them is Uganda. That is why 
they are running away into Uganda with their cattle. I don't think it got 
anything to do with the 2011 election.
   
  Mu7's presidency is ending, and 2011 election is most definitely going to be 
taken by FDC. Ugandans want change, and now. Any force to keep the NRA/M in 
power is going to lead to war!! If I were the LRA/M, I would not even waste my 
time with the peace talk. 
   
  Uganda is being exploited to the bone; we have a government that is only 
responsible to neo-colonialists, not its citizens. Any armed groups or 
opposition cannot compromise their position, if informed by ideology, with such 
a government. Period. Those who compromise with the regime will get killed, but 
the bigger problem will still remain. 
   
  So, Emmy this is not about preparation for election. This is about the 
conflict, being perpetuated by neo-colonialism.
   
  Ocii

Emmy Wasirwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
      .hmmessage P  {  margin:0px;  padding:0px  }  body.hmmessage  {  
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;  FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma  }    
ocii,
Dont you think they are being prepared for election come 2011. I am just being 
curious. 
 
Emmy

    
---------------------------------
  Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:19:20 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Samaritan, what / who is Mulaaloo?!
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [email protected]

  Gau,
   
  "what does it take a Mulaloo to become a Ugandan citizen?"
   
  Sometime I wonder really! Do you realise that there are Ugandan Balaalos, DR. 
Congo Balaalos ( Banyamulenge and Hemas); Rwandese and Burundi Balaalos? 
   
  Lets remove the Term "Mulaloo" and replace it with "Acholi", & Kenya as the 
country of reference, may be then you will notce the ridiculousness of the 
question. It will read:
   
  "what does it take an Acholi to become a Kenyan citizen?"
   
  We have Luo in Kenya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Central Africa, etc, just like 
Balaalos have cousins in Uganda, DR. Congo, Rwanda, Burundi!
   
  Why should an Acholi become a Kenyan? 
   
  Why should a Rwandese, Congolese, Burundian, Mulaalo become a Ugandan 
Mulaalo? Are you suggesting that all Balaalos become Ugandans?? If so why?
   
  These people have their homes where they used to live in, peacefully! They 
cannot cause genocide in their own homes then run away to acquire citzenship 
some place else! What are laws for? African cannot resort to silly immigration 
policies. 
   
  If you ran away from your home, like the non-Ugandan Balaalos, for political 
reasons, then you automatically become a refugee, should your claim be 
accepted! You cannot become a citizen! Granting citizenship by African 
governments, to an entire ethnic population, cannot obviously be the way 
forward.
   
  These Non-Ugandan Balaalos have their homes. If they screwed it up and are 
now runing away from, to come to Uganda, Ugandans have every right to know why 
they screwed their homes up! We cannot just grant them citizenship!
   
  It all boils down to what did you do in your own home to force you to run 
away from, before any considerations can be granted! Mind you, the Balaalos' 
seeminging migration is not just about one or two member of a family running 
away! This seems mass migration! 
   
  If they were not mass migrating before, then why mass migrate now??
   
  We all want African solidarity. But encouraging flaws is not the way to go.
   
  Ocii
   
  Many times your logic are so wacked!
   
  Ocii

NOC´LADUMAS GEORGES <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
      .ExternalClass .EC_hmmessage P  {padding:0px;}  .ExternalClass 
EC_body.hmmessage  {font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;}      PEACE HAIL!! 
   
  Would any Samaritan out there reach out while we others shield from blood: 
   
  WHAT ARE THE LAWS OR COMBINATIONS OF, THAT ARE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE FOR OR 
AGAINST THE BALALOO? 
   
  I guess on the forum are scholars from our various centres of learning in 
Uganda as well as our national institutions of government.
   
  Particularly, what are the law combinations restricting a Ugandan’s liberty 
to settlement in Uganda?
   
  What are the provisions of immigration laws / legislation in as far as the 
Balaloo are concerned?
   
  II identify certain unrsolved factors that keep poping up in the debates : 
NATIONALITY, SIZE / NUMBER , BENEFIT, LEGAL POSSESSION (RIGHT TO SELF 
DETERMINATION OVER PROPERTY
   
  Some time back, some one inquired here on the forum, what the prerequisites 
for becoming a Muganda. I suppose that is just as viable now with the so called 
Balaloo: 
   
  what does it take a Mulaloo to become a Ugandan citizen?
   
  Even if I do not precisely know what these Balaloo are (at one moment the 
level of humiliation is that they are pastoral Ugandan. At another, the 
derogation is that they are aliens), spontaneously, I bear with Desmond & co.
   
  Unfortunately, there are various affiliations with spectacularly vested 
interest at play. Alienation of Balaloos then becomes the open denominator. 
Under the surface is a whole ocean of masked vendettas like: FEDEROS, 
NATIONALISTS, DEMOCRATS, TRIBALISTS, REGIONAL SECTARIANS etc.
   
  So scholars, tell us, what is that make Balaoos non-Ugandan! What laws 
restrict pastoral movements? I am aware it is not so much their settling 
anywhere in Uganda but the manner they “ACQUIRE” the new pasture that is the 
central issue. If so what is the alienation about?
   
  My great grand father Laula Ojwang used to say, “Gau every where you go, you 
are a foreigner: every where you go there is people you going to meet: Don’t 
turn your back on the man because he comes from another land; hold out your 
hands and speak”.
   
  In their days from the lines of Nyipir and Labongo, they had customarily 
solved their immigration problems simplistically: 
   
  “Opii en aye opii; kitino pa opii pe opii”.  Translated in English it 
corresponds to: “ THE SLAVE IS A SLAVE; THE CHILDREN OF THE SLAVE ARE NOT 
SLAVES” 
   
  To me, a central action from the political establishment should be to 
identify feasible methods. 
   
  Whilst any Ugandan is free to settle any where in Uganda, they should take 
consideration of the hospitality of the native customs. They cannot just come 
into some customs and want to take over instead of assimilating and together 
developing the culture. In which case, the number /size of the settlers matter. 
It should not be of such a proportion that the native does not contain. Equally 
so, some fair contrast between the customs.
    
  They the politicians must come out with a functional structure where the 
owners of the land themselves both benefit from and initiate the settlement.
   
  There must be viable formulae for dialogue!!
  noc'la gau

  
---------------------------------
  Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger
   

  
---------------------------------
  Do you know a place like the back of your hand? Share local knowledge with 
BackOfMyHand.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ugandans at Heart" group. 
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Ugandans-at-Heart?hl=en 
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---



       
---------------------------------
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! 
Answers. 
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to