Ocii,
 
I know what you said and it was absolutely nothing. You still haven't told me a 
single thing that's untrue in what I wrote. All I get are further questions 
from you, in essence asking me to do the research for you. I wish you could get 
off your lazy backside and try to find out for yourself the things you don't 
know, instead of first arguing and then requesting to be enlightened. I have 
neither the time nor the inclination to repeat all the reasons for Kabaka 
Mutesa's case against Obote, because they are clearly spelt out in what I 
wrote. 
 
Corruption - this is not just a claim, there is concrete evidence of thousands 
of pounds deposited on one of the looters' bank account (the group involved in 
sharing the gold were disclosed as: Milton Obote, Onama, Nekyon and Idi Amin). 
Obote was pressurized into putting up a Commission of Enquiry but made sure 
that it's activities were limited. Restrictions were put on the type of 
evidence the Commission could accept, e.g. "evidence adversely affecting the 
reputation of any person, or tending to reflect in any way upon the character 
or conduct of any person" was inadmissible. One of the people to whom the 
Commission's activities would extend was Obote himself, who had recently 
usurped all executive powers of the President and suspended the Constitution as 
well as detaining five of his own ministers. The Commission itself was 
appointed by and would report to one of his ministers. Surely it is not rocket 
science for you to understand that, in these circumstances, the Commission was 
rendered impotent and unable to carry out its activities properly. Still, the 
Commission, even with these restrictions, was preparing a report which was 
supposed to be ready by July 1964. Well, it was never published.
 
Contrary to what you believe, the President (Kabaka Mutesa at the time), was 
the Supreme Head and Commander-in-Chief of Uganda. In other words, he was the 
Constitutional Head of State in whom the executive authority of Uganda vested 
and the Prime Minister had to keep the President informed of all matters 
concerning te conduct of Government. He was therefore not just ceremonial as 
you claim. 
 
It was Obote who sent Ugandan troops to Congo, only he 'forgot' to inform the 
President. The issue was also never debated by Parliament prior to sending 
them, thereby setting a bad precedent which would be repeated decades later by 
the current President. So it was a unilateral decision by the Prime Minister 
and an illegal one.
 
Kasangwawo.


Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:14:06 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: [Ugnet] Fwd: 
Obote was right to attack Lubiri (Abbey Semuwemba)To: [email protected]
Kasangwawo,
 
When I say Kabaka Mutesa had no case against Dr. Obote 1 government, I am not 
just trying twist issues; I mean exactly what I said.
 
Since claim of corruption is in the centre of the 1966 crisis, can you tell us, 
or bring to readers' attention how much public funds Dr. Obote and his 
entourage then, looted from Uganda taxpayers?
 
And since to you, President Mutesa was the Commander-in-Chief (sorry for the 
mixed-up in my initial response), how was it that Ugandan troops ended up in 
Congo?
 
Ociijonah kasangwawo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Ocii, I still don't see where you refute my statements with facts. You have 
highlighted huge chunks of what I wrote but did not disprove any of it. Can you 
please tell me just a single thing that is not true in my article. Give me the 
facts ! All you keep on repeating is that you don't see any fault by Obote in 
overthrowing the constitution (of course you wouldn't, much as you are in love 
with your hero), and that Ochieng was KY. So what, if he was KY ?  Is it 
because Obote wanted a one-party state that you think anything a member of 
another party did was wrong ?"Obote as the first president of Uganda" ! Are you 
kidding me ? Do you honestly not know that Obote was not the first president of 
Uganda ? I might be wasting my time here. Kasangwawo.


Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:02:56 -0500From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: [Ugnet] Fwd: 
Obote was right to attack Lubiri (Abbey Semuwemba)To: [email protected]
Mr. Kasangwawo,
 
I did take time to read what you wrote on the crisis that led to Dr. Obote 
taking action to establish law and order in the country in 1966.
 
Trust me Mr. Kasangwawo Baganda has absolutely no case against Dr. Obote as the 
first president of Uganda, or even as a person, dead as he is, for kicking 
Kabaka Mutesa out of Mengo. 
 
This is the part that interested me in your write-up. The rest are your 
opinion, that to me does not count, until when we know exactly what led to the 
crisis. 
 
You have attempted to explain it; I wonder whether your explanation is based on 
Kabaka Mutesa's book you mentioned to readers.
 
(((By J. Kasangwawo
 
It is not unusual for all sorts of people to declare that Mengo wanted to kick 
Obote's government off Buganda soil, without making any attempt to mention the 
events culminating in that act, thereby giving the impression that somehow the 
members of the Lukiiko just woke up one fine morning and decided to order Obote 
out of Buganda without any reason. As I will show below, several attempts were 
made, not only by the Great Lukiiko but also by the then President Muteesa II 
himself, to bring Obote to reason and convince him to change his ways and 
retract his unconstitutional acts - all to no avail. It was only after all 
attempts had failed, that the Lukiiko made it clear that the basis on which 
Buganda had agreed to be part of an independent country called Uganda had been 
violated and told Obote to remove his government from Buganda soil.
Having said that, the Lukiiko was the only institution that made any visible 
attempt to stop Obote's illegal acts while others were numb due to his 
machinations.
Now to the events:
The Uganda government had supported the Congolese Simba rebels led by Gbenye 
(an army whose fighters dressed in monkey skins and cannibalized their 
opponents) during the armed conflict between Tshombe and Gbenye in the early 
60s. At the end of the operations, some Ugandan MPs started raising questions 
as to who authorized the Uganda forces beyond guarding the Uganda border. There 
were also allegations that gold and ivory was brought back and shared among 
certain individuals. The issue was first publicly discussed in Parliament when 
a government backbencher tabled a motion on 12th March 1965 concerning the 
security situation in Buganda, the main objective of which was to ban Kabaka 
Yekka (KY) by branding it a party of criminals. During the debate, a DP member, 
Gaspari Oda, sought to amend the motion by adding corruption in the civil 
service and armed forces, which he said was a factor in the insecurity not only 
in Buganda but throughout the country. The amendment was finally defeated but 
not before Daudi Ochieng (KY) and Alexander Latim (DP) had introduced a lot of 
information in support of the amendment. Ochieng confirmed that the insecurity 
was not confined to Buganda but was spread throughout the country; that the 
soldiers patrolling near the Congo border in West Nile were becoming lawless; 
that morale in the armed forces was low due to the soldiers' belief that a few 
senior officers were making personal financial gain out of the border incidents.
Ochieng also informed Parliament that Amin, who was then Deputy Commander of 
the Uganda Army, had visited West Nile several times and had been seen bringing 
back parcels to his home in Entebbe which he guarded with utmost security. 
Through a mistake by the post office, whereby Amin's bank statement was put 
into the wrong box, the following information about his deposits became 
available: he had deposited $1,500 on 5th February 1965; $9,000 on 15th Feb; 
$3,000 on 17th Feb; $28,250 on 26th Feb and $3,250 on 2nd March. As Amin had no 
known private means of income, Ochieng wanted Onama, the Minister of Defence, 
to initiate an investigation into this sudden windfall. Incidentally, Onama had 
told Parliament at the beginning of the debate that Amin's bank account stood 
at $2,400.
Before introducing the information to Parliament, Ochieng and Latim had the 
courtesy of informing Onama and the Inspector General of Police about the whole 
situation. When Amin got wind of the reports, he phoned Latim and threatened to 
kill him and Ochieng. He later apologized to both gentlemen claiming that he 
had been upset by the allegations about his bank account. Onama, on his part, 
dismissed the allegations against Amin calling them "latrine talks". He even 
suggested that Amin's relatives had given him the money, or that Congolese 
refugees might have given it to him for safe keeping. Realizing the futility of 
his justifications, Onama promised to initiate investigations into the matter. 
The investigations were never carried out, since Brigadier Opolot, the 
Commander of the Uganda Army, was prevented from initiating them according to 
the Military Law.
The matter was left unanswered until Ochieng revived it on 4th February 1966 
after the Penal (Amendment) Bill, section 41, which sought to curb the 
activities of KY, had been passed. His motion sought to suspend Amin pending 
investigations into his account. Ochieng alleged that some members of the 
government, together with Colonel Amin, were planning a coup to overthrow the 
Constitution. During the debate, it was disclosed that Milton Obote, Felix 
Onama and Adoko Nekyon, Minister of Planning and Community Development, had 
received large amounts of money from gold and elephant tusks from Congo after 
Uganda Army's incursions into that country. All the ministers present, except 
Onama (who denied the charges), were of the opinion that there was substance in 
the allegations. The Prime Minister knew that Ochieng would introduce the 
motion on 4th February but in his usual cowardly manner decided to go on a tour 
of the North from 1st Feb. until 12th Feb. All MPs present on both sides of the 
House, except government-backbencher John Kakonge, agreed to the suspension of 
Idi Amin and the police investigations. Nevertheless, Colonel Amin was just 
given two weeks' leave in contradiction to Parliament's wishes. Kakonge 
curiously stated that Obote's absence was suspicious.
On 13th February 1966, nine days after the accusations against him, Obote 
called a press conference and denied ever receiving gold or tusks from Congo or 
participating in any plans to overthrow the Constitution. As to the suspension 
of Amin, he said that there were still legal hitches to be straightened out 
before Parliament's resolution could be put into effect. Meanwhile, Onama, Amin 
and Nekyon also denied the accusations and demanded an apology from Ochieng 
within two days, which Ochieng rightly ignored. On 15th February the Cabinet 
asked Obote to read a statement to the press announcing its decision to set up 
a judicial commission to investigate Ochieng's allegations. He also called on 
Ochieng to make a statement to the police by 19th February.
Ochieng made the statement to the police but instead of suspension, Obote 
promoted Amin to the post of Commander of Uganda Army with effect from 23rd 
February 1966 and created a new post of Military Advisor to the Cabinet into 
which he moved Brigadier Opolot. (this is nowadays called 'putting someone on 
katebe').
On 22nd February, Obote out of the blue staged a coup d'etat against his own 
government and usurped all powers with the following statement:
'In the interest of national stability and public security and tranquility, I 
have today, the 22nd day of February 1966, taken over all powers of the 
government of Uganda. (under which article of the constitution ?) I shall 
henceforth be advised by a Council whose members I shall name later. I have 
taken this course of action independently because of my understanding of the 
wishes of the people of this country for peace, order and prosperity. (yeah, 
right !) Five former ministers have today been put under detention pending 
investigations into their activities. I call upon the judges and magistrates, 
civil servants - both Uganda and expatriate members of the security forces and 
the general public to carry on with their normal duties. I take this 
opportunity to assure everybody that the whole situation is under control.'
The five ministers who were arrested during a cabinet meeting and put under 
detention were: Dr. E.S. Lumu - Minister of Health and Chairman of UPC Buganda 
Region; Grace Ibingira - Minister of State and Chairman of UPC Ankole Kingdom; 
M. Ngobi - Minister of Agriculture & Cooperatives; B.K. Kirya - Minister of 
Mineral and Water Resources and Chairman of UPC Bukedi District and G.B. Magezi 
- Minister of Housing and Labour.
Obote's acts were the beginning of unconstitutionalism in Uganda.)))
 
Mr. Kasangwawo if from the above writing you cannot see that Kabaka Mutesa had 
completely no case agains Dr. Obote's government of that time then I seriously 
shudder.
 
Ochieng was apparently a KY. And given the security concern in Buganda,(NOT 
throughout Uganda, that was KY manipulations) KY being suspected, and consider 
further that all these allegagtions and accussations that led to the 1966 
crisis were just about the brain child of (Ochieng?), do you seriously see a 
case against Dr. Obote 1 government? 
 
I have highlighted part of what I consider either important or outright flaw, 
in making decision on the crisis, in blue.
 
I seriously don't see any fault by Dr. Obote in making a move against the Unity 
government. It was the Kabaka and his KY, that Ochieng was fronting for, who 
were grossly mistaken and definitely engaged in acts of sedition in attempting 
to assume power by any means.
 
I could be entirely wrong.
 
Ocii
jonah kasangwawo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


BWambuga, is it then any surprise that this topic of Buganda/Obote keeps coming 
up, when people like you are persisting on distributing misinformation about 
what really happened ? It is not about whether Obote was stupid or dumb. It is 
a well-known fact that he was cunning as a fox and ready to usurp all powers by 
any means. This included pretending to be nice to people he didn't particularly 
like, in order to deceive them about his ultimate intentions. So it is no 
wonder that Buganda and the Kabaka at first believed him. But it didn't take 
long for his true colours to come out. In his book (the correct name is 
"Desecration of my kingdom"), Kabaka Mutesa II clearly explained the reasons 
why he, in his capacity as President, had requested for foreign troops. The 
request for troops was not to invade Uganda, as you and Obote claim, but on the 
contrary, it was an attempt to save the country from a Prime Minister who was 
bent on overthrowing the constitution by force of arms and wrest all powers to 
himself. Statements had been made by members of parliament that troops were 
secretly being trained to do just that. Army officers who did not share this 
illegal aim were even detained or suspended. On his return to Kampala from his 
hiding place in the North in February 1966, Obote himself admitted that there 
was great alarm due to troop movements, especially in Kampala. Neither Mutesa, 
as the Commander-in-Chief, nor the Brigadier, who was head of the army, had 
authorized these troop movements. Obote had ordered the movements himself.  The 
Kabaka states in the book that when he requested for foreign troops, he was 
thinking about something similar to the intervention Obote had initiated 2 
years before this incident. Hopefully you are aware that in 1964 Obote had 
invited British troops to quell a mutiny by Uganda soldiers in Jinja who, 
incidentally, were not attempting to take over the country but rather were just 
demanding for higher pay. This he did without informing the President who was 
Commander-in-Chief of the Uganda Army.  It appears this was his modus operandi. 
In any case, Obote used this incident to sack some soldiers and promote those 
he wanted in control to carry out his illegal manipulations, among them the 
then Major Idi Amin.  If you want to learn more about this go to the following 
link: http://www.federo.com/index.php?id=144The claim that Obote's regime wired 
money to the Kabaka when he was in exile in London is also a myth, without an 
iota of truth. There is concrete evidence that Obote's government kept on 
protesting about the treatment they thought the British were giving to the 
Kabaka (Obote felt they were still treating him as king by refering to him as 
Kabaka). The British govt. on the other hand was not ready to support the 
Kabaka financially or otherwise, leaving him to rely on support of friends - 
they were even pressurizing him to sell his property back home in Buganda in 
order for him to survive. In short, they viewed him as a burden. In these 
circumstances, the British would not mind anyone giving him support, as long as 
it wasn't them. Therefore, for you to claim that they were concerned about the 
Uganda government wiring him money, is an outright lie. The only proposal 
Obote's government was ready to consider was the remittance of private funds 
(from the sale of Kabaka's property) to England for Sir Edward. Kasangwawo.


Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 11:46:42 -0700From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]: [Ugnet] Fwd: Obote was right to attack Lubiri (Abbey Semuwemba)
 
_________________________________________________________________
Explore the seven wonders of the world
http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=7+wonders+world&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
[email protected]
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/


The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including 
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------

Reply via email to