On 2 May 2012, at 06:25, "Steve Dyer" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Nicholas Lansman, who 'is' ISPA, was on Radio 4 a few days ago on this 
> subject. He was rambling and not persuasive in any way.  There are other more 
> effective organisations:
> http://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/2012/what-they-want-is-control
> However the reality is that copyright holders, politicians, police, the 
> media, and censors like IWF and the Whitehouse tendancy all benefit from 
> being seen to "do something" and they don't really care if it's effective or 
> if it damages civil liberty.
> Read the above article, which clearly makes the point that the internet is a 
> communication tool not "the media". It should no more be censored than your 
> telephone conversations. It is not a broadcast medium, it is a personal one 
> and rights of free speech should be upheld.
> Those who profit from control of the distribution channels of music and film 
> need to change their business models, because we are witnessing the death of 
> such control, and the death of much of the "media".

The problem with ORG is they believe they speak for a majority that doesn't 
exist.

If I take your point to conclusion then I should be able to setup hundreds of 
phishing sites and laugh all the way to the bank. You can't have your cake and 
eat it.


Reply via email to