On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Paul Mansfield <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 August 2013 20:04, Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote: >> There is no way a wifi link off an android is going to do much better >> than that. > > indeed, the download of 33M wasn't what was disappointing, it was the > upload that was what bothered me. > >> I have generally found most home routers can't forward at much more >> than 100Mbit. Are you going through their gear exclusively or do you >> have a home router in-line? > > I found a spare Draytek 2820 which should be able to push a fair > amount of traffic, better than 8 to 12Megabits/sec anyway!
Well, "should" and "actually can" is something worth affirming.... Anyway: I have a netperf server located on linode in britain if you would like to test against your link using rrul (need netperf 2.6 and netperf-wrappers, and linux). In testing symmetric traffic on verizon in the US, these were the results I obtained without and with a fq_codel enabled htb shaper: http://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/RRUL_Rogues_Gallery#Verizon-FIOS-Testing-at-25Mbit-up-and-25Mbit-down Regrettably the cerowrt router I used for this test is incapable at shaping at much more than 40Mbit in each direction. The code, however, runs on nearly every modern linux. A cheap dual ethernet atom box would work... >> It seems likely your netbook lacks oomph, too. > > yeah, I'll be able to test with something better soon. > > > thanks! > Paul > -- Dave Täht Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
