Hi Neil, One vendor the same, the other has moved chipset Vendors in the CPE within the last year (for the better).
Happy to discuss next time I see you, we are also about to kick off a vectoring trial with one of vendors - be interested to compare notes on that as well! Regards... Ben On 30 October 2013 18:27, Neil J. McRae <n...@domino.org> wrote: > Ben, > Thanks it mirrors much of my own experience– in your scenario - are the > same vendors using different chipsets in the DSLAM versus CPE? > > Neil. > > From: Ben King <b...@warwicknet.com> > Date: Wednesday, 30 October 2013 18:24 > To: "Neil J. McRae" <n...@domino.org> > Cc: "Haroldo F. Jardim" <hfjar...@gmail.com>, "steve.hous...@itps.co.uk" < > steve.hous...@itps.co.uk>, "uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk" < > uknof@lists.uknof.org.uk> > > Subject: Re: [uknof] BTW FTTC VDSL Modem > > Hi Neil, > > I can say that we have found the 887VA very good in terms of VDSL2 > compliance across different chipsets (we are split vendor on our SLU > deployments - trying to ditch the original as fast as we can). > > I can also say that VDSL2 performance varies wildly depending on chipset > and how you mix manufacturers. I have great examples of where you get > better sync rates mixing vendor DSLAMs and CPEs as opposed to same vendor > at both ends of the link. > > Regards... Ben > > > On 30 October 2013 18:16, Neil J. McRae <n...@domino.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 30/10/2013 16:07, "Haroldo F. Jardim" <hfjar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >Hi Steve, >> > >> >I actually have an 887VA-W myself and have been using the built in VDSL >> >controller for a couple of years now without any problems. >> >> Haroldo, >> >> >> Do you see any noticeable difference in sync performance? >> >> One of the concerns raised by some of my colleagues about doing a wires >> free service is the requirements in compatibility between chipset vendors, >> and personally speaking in the past (with Cisco 8xx specifically) on >> ADSL2/2+ was pretty challenging with different chipsets in different >> CPE/DSLAMS. >> Also need to ensure future chipset compliance with a potential vectoring >> roll out. >> >> >> Regards, >> Neil. >> >> >> > > > -- > > Ben King <b...@warwicknet.com <j...@warwicknet.com>>**** > > *WarwickNet - The Business & Science Park ISP* > > Tel: 024 7699 7222** > > Mob: 07973 848007** > > http://www.warwicknet.com**** > > ** > > > -- Ben King <b...@warwicknet.com <j...@warwicknet.com>>**** *WarwickNet - The Business & Science Park ISP* Tel: 024 7699 7222** Mob: 07973 848007** http://www.warwicknet.com**** **
