On 02/05/2014 09:15, Andy Davidson wrote: > Another note - It is likely to be significantly cheaper to try to > avoid having to lay large capacity into London from Harwell, e.g. by > serving content out of racks in region and populating/feeding the > data cache on smaller links from your office for example. IOW, run > the fatter pipes the shortest distance.
Hi John, Is there a reason you couldn't stick a dish or two up on the roof of a central London DC? We had a customer do something similar in Manchester (IFL2 / Reynolds) a few years ago. Their method of ingest (a rack full of digiboxes) was, ahem, interesting to say the least though ;) Rich.
