Considering we are the *Satellite Applications* Catapult I should consider this :-)
-----Original Message----- From: uknof [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Halfpenny Sent: 02 May 2014 10:12 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [uknof] Here is a Challenge On 02/05/2014 09:15, Andy Davidson wrote: > Another note - It is likely to be significantly cheaper to try to > avoid having to lay large capacity into London from Harwell, e.g. by > serving content out of racks in region and populating/feeding the data > cache on smaller links from your office for example. IOW, run the > fatter pipes the shortest distance. Hi John, Is there a reason you couldn't stick a dish or two up on the roof of a central London DC? We had a customer do something similar in Manchester (IFL2 / Reynolds) a few years ago. Their method of ingest (a rack full of digiboxes) was, ahem, interesting to say the least though ;) Rich. This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) to whom they are addressed. If you have received it in error, please destroy all copies and inform the sender. This email and any attachments are believed to be free from viruses but the Satellite Applications Catapult accepts no liability in connection therewith. Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Satellite Applications Catapult.
