On 14 Aug 2014, at 11:17, Bruce Simpson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Slightly OT, however: my reference to FreeBSD in the context of Netconf > should in no way be read as advocating its use as a general-purpose > provisioning tool. > > I am using FreeBSD in a very specific role -- i.e. as a test environment for > new IP architectures -- therefore I want FreeBSD to look as much like a > router as possible. Ah, never mind then :-) I missed the context; I thought you were lusting after a general-purpose NetConf schema for general-purpose servers (hence subsequent rambling). Joe
