On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:59:24 +0000, David Wilkinson <[email protected]> 
said:

    > I assume I would have make sure those communities are removed
    > from the upstream and downstream announcements like I would for
    > private ASNs?

It would probably be good practice, and I would imagine that people
might generally filter them on receipt since there is no way to
determine their canonical semantics or to avoid collisions...

As a workaround, I wonder if it would be worthwhile to reserve a few
16 bit ASNs and then operate a community registry for the use of those
with 32 bit ASNs underneath them...

-w
--
William Waites <[email protected]>  |  School of Informatics
   http://tardis.ed.ac.uk/~wwaites/       | University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in
Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

Attachment: pgpaN0FiSiwAN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to