On 24/10/16 23:11, Tom Bird wrote: > I've got some Cisco 3502i access points which are running an up to date > standalone image, and I've given them all IPv6 only addresses for > management as they are a purely layer 2 device and shouldn't need a v4 > address so why bother.
My experience with this stuff and Cisco lately (and indeed, for a while) has been that if it's not there, it just isn't there - no magic exists that I'm aware of. Short of NAT46 features in your local management gateway, I'd recommend logging a case with Cisco and asking where the feature is, and/or raising a bug about it. And just using some RFC1918 in the mean time. At least, if you've reported it, any hacks made might have a half life. :) -- Tom
