On 31/10/16 22:09, Tom Hill wrote: > I was really just referring to IPv6/IPv4 feature parity, tbf. > > But, I'm sure there are countless other implementation/documentation > holes out there - as evidenced. :)
Annoying for something as basic as setting the clock, when it claims to have NTPv4 support, and it works fine on a 2960. And everything else works. In the end, I've just told it not to locally timestamp the logs, as the syslog server does it anyway. -- Tom :: www.portfast.co.uk / @portfast :: hosted services, domains, virtual machines, consultancy
