On 29/10/16 23:14, Chris Russell wrote: > That's been true for quite a while ... Cisco datasheets I now treat as > more a generic "might" over "will" guide, plus there is often confusing > terminology.
I was really just referring to IPv6/IPv4 feature parity, tbf. But, I'm sure there are countless other implementation/documentation holes out there - as evidenced. :) -- Tom
