Emails like this make me chuckle when we are the biggest VoIP provider in the 
country ;)

We typically don’t port numbers or use premium rate numbers in the way being 
requested on the PSTN for a variety of  reasons - the biggest one being the 
ability to make inbound signalling work which requires a lot of effort for 
single numbers and causes billing and other challenges and a lot of these are 
mostly not within our control. And yes we’ve started to path to turn off PSTN. 

Neil. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 21 May 2018, at 15:26, Tim Bray <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On 21/05/18 11:24, David Derrick wrote:
>> 
>> Why faff about getting the pretty number on the PSTN line? I assume
>> the Tamar Telecom number is a VoIP one, why not use the VoIP service
>> properly? Or port the number to a VoIP provider if it isn't. 
> 
> 
> I suspect, in theory, porting a number into BT is possible.  I suspect,
> in theory, it is possible without the broadband line being disconnected
> in the process.   You might even be able to migrate the broadband or
> convert to FTTC in the future without a mess up.
> 
> I suspect in practice, you are asking for something not done very often.
> That nobody really knows how to do.  And that it will give you hassle
> forever.
> 
> Why not just leave it on a forward to the existing PSTN number, and pay
> the  less than 1p a minute.  (and hopefully a provider with no minimum
> call charge).
> 
> IMHO, you are much better having the number you really care about
> sitting with a VoIP provider (as in, not BT). 
> 
> I bet with the right voice provider, you could even Carrier preselect on
> outbound calls, and set the CLI to the one you want.  Again, will cost a
> little bit, but not much in the whole scheme of things.
> 
> 
> I also have a view point.  Ported numbers never seem to be quite as
> reliable (for inbound calls) as a native number from your provider's (or
> their preferred upstream) allocation.
> 
> *****
> 
> Why did you order a BT-Net line? I presume not related to above?
> 
> 
> Tim
> 

Reply via email to