Thanks Phil and David for the information. I did check those websites
that Phil mentioned. I purchased the full version of linuxant modem. It
costs cheaper than an external modem.

Again thanx for the help guys.
Arun

-----Original Message-----
From: UM Linux User's Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Phil Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 3:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [UM-LINUX] Modem configuring

I have the 700m as well, and I was able to get gentoo installed it quite

nicely. However, I can't verify the modem's status - hell, I don't even 
have a land phone line to test it with :)

Check this out if you haven't already, it's for FC3:
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~mmastran/fedora-core-3/
(specifically http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~mmastran/fedora-core-3/modem -
he 
says he got it to work with the Linuxant.com drivers but the full
version 
costs $15 and the free version only works at 14.4K)

but! on the bright side:
http://www.progsoc.org/~wildfire/notes/dell700m.html
claims that it's a smlink modem and they actually have drivers on their 
site (!) located here: http://www.smlink.com/content.aspx?id=132  (local

mirror here: http://wmuc.umd.edu/~andersop/data/slmodem-2.9.10.tar.gz )

those directions are for debian specifically, but it seems that they 
center around the package "slmodem" (which comes from the smlink site 
above), and also installing libasound2-dev and compiling the modem
driver 
with alsa support. then, the driver can be run as a daemon with
./slmodem -a 'modem:1' as root.

Good luck - I've managed to get almost everything else running on there 
under gentoo, except the power managment (blah, what a mess) and


On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, David Zakar wrote:

> Just to head it off, blah blah, you should buy an external serial
modem.
> With that out of the way...
>
> Could you be more specific about what you tried, regarding the
linmodem
> drivers? Links would be good, too.
>
> -DMZ
>
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:14 -0400, Arun Mallikarjunan wrote:
>> I found information about linmodem but I am
>> not able to get it to work.
>

Reply via email to