Now I am certainly not on M$'s side here, but .NET wasn't cut, LDDM wasn't cut, WFS wasn't cut (well WFS integrates into VS2005 just fine....well, as fine as a M$ can). Indexing and integrated searching wasn't cut. MONAD...don't know what that was an old name for. And I can't recall what Avalon and Indigo were....can't M$ use code names that are somewhat easier to associate? In any case, it's hard to read an argument when the opening statement is invalid. Also, by him referring to WinVista as Longhorn, I assume it's an old article? -Russ
-----Original Message----- From: UM Linux User's Group [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Moskovchenko Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 1:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [UM-LINUX] Interesting: [Fwd: How Microsoft Will Die by James R. Stoup] Hello all. This is an article that was sent to me by a co-worker. It appeared on an Apple fan web site called Apple Matters. Keep the source in mind, but it is still an amusing read (especially that part about IE7). Enjoy
