I honestly just wanted to laugh. Anyone who's familiar (read some books
about it) with Apple's corporate history knows that, if anyone's their
own worst enemy, it's Apple.

Apple's had a copious amount of mindshare forever, yet has been _totally
unable_ to convert that to concrete computer market share gains. Apple
has only just managed to make it back to their _nominal_,
non-inflation-adjusted revenues from their Apple II days.  The idea that
Microsoft is now on its last legs because Steve Jobs is back (much of
Apple's current troubles are a result of Steve's bad decisions in the
past) and MacOS X doesn't suck reeks of delusion. Then you just toss in
the Cedega crap, and it's obvious the guy doesn't understand the market
at all.

-DMZ, a long-time Mac, Windows, and Linux user

On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:44 -0400, Steve Moskovchenko wrote:
> Hello all.
> This is an article that was sent to me by a co-worker. It appeared on an
> Apple fan web site called Apple Matters. Keep the source in mind, but it
> is still an amusing read (especially that part about IE7).
> 
> Enjoy
> email message attachment, "Forwarded message - How Microsoft Will Die
> by James R. Stoup"
> On Sun, 2005-08-28 at 01:44 -0400, Steve Moskovchenko wrote:
> > Longhorn, by the features
> > 
> > 
> > WFS: Cut
> > 
> > .NET Framework: Cut
> > 
> > MONAD: Cut
> > 
> > Integrated Search: Cut
> > 
> > Avalon: Who knows?
> > 
> > Indigo: Who knows?
> > 
> > IE7: You can repaint a Kia, lower it down, put rims on it and think you are 
> > cool, but at the end of the day it is still a Kia. 
> > 
> > 
> > And so it goes, on and on. Feature after feature is cut, promise after 
> > promise is broken, and what do we have at the end of the day? XP SP3. If 
> > Microsoft fails to deliver something approaching decent with Longhorn then 
> > they will be in trouble. Big trouble. And most people haven’t even 
> > realized this yet. But they will soon enough. 
> > 
> > 
> > Why are they in trouble?
> > 
> > 
> > Momentum. It all boils down to momentum. Google has it. Sony has it. Apple 
> > has it pouring out of its orifices, Microsoft though. . .not so much.   
> > 
> > 
> > You see momentum is what pushes that reluctant manager to go ahead and 
> > upgrade his system instead of waiting for something better or (very scary 
> > music plays in the background) switching to Linux. Momentum is what gets a 
> > word of mouth campaign going that convinces your everyday user to go out 
> > and 
> > buy the latest OS. Momentum is what keeps the media friendly, sort of.   
> > 
> > 
> > But lately MS has been getting all of the wrong types of momentum. They 
> > aren’t getting that “battering ram” momentum no, it’s more like at 
> > sinking ship momentum. You see the ram is going through, but the ship is 
> > going down. Big difference. 
> > 
> > 
> > Right now Microsoft can’t even hold a press release about Longhorn without 
> > either saying its going to be delayed again or that they are cutting even 
> > more features. This really makes them look incompetent. I mean, I know they 
> > are incompetent but this really lets the rest of the world in on the joke 
> > as 
> > well. 
> > 
> > 
> > And no matter how they spin it they have now reached the point where it’s 
> > impossible to make the situation sound any better than it is. Three years 
> > ago they could have made these announcements from a position of strength. 
> > Two years ago they could have made these announcements and then lied 
> > heavily 
> > in hopes of saving face. One year ago they made these announcements and it 
> > started looking really scary for anyone whose business depended on 
> > Longhorn. 
> > And now this year these announcements make them look like a company that is 
> > adrift, with no real vision, desperately trying not to drown. 
> > Congratulations Bill you have officially lost any momentum you thought you 
> > might have had.   
> > 
> > 
> > The 3 nails in the MS coffin
> > 
> > 
> > In order of importance:
> > 
> > 
> > 1. Microsoft
> > 
> > They have always been their worst enemy. Shoddy software practices are 
> > forced on programmers due to incompetent managers which in turn produces 
> > the 
> > mess that is Longhorn. Even if the computing world was relatively quiet 
> > (which it isn’t, not by a long shot) then MS would still be in deep horse 
> > pucky over the gross stupidity that their leadership has shown. And to make 
> > matters even worse management has now realized that this time there isn’t 
> > going to be a “quick fix”. There are no more features left to cut. This 
> > time the deadline is real because their competitors are getting their act 
> > together in a way that hasn’t ever happened before. 
> > 
> > 
> > 2. Apple
> > 
> > Making matters worse is Steve Jobs. He has Apple humming like fine tuned 
> > violin. Tiger is everything Apple promised and its only been released for 
> > three months or so. And I imagine things are only going to improve.  And if 
> > that wasn’t enough Apple is going to squeeze out yet another OS before 
> > Microsoft can get Longhorn out the door. Ouch, yet another kick in the 
> > balls. Then you have this whole Macintel thing going on plus rumors about 
> > the iPod/ITMS/movie business all of which draw the attention of the media 
> > towards Apple’s successes. 
> > 
> > 
> > 3. Linux
> > 
> > Never forget Linux. They may be a disorganized, fragmented group who may 
> > not 
> > present a challenge on the desktop but they are chipping away slowly at 
> > MS’s dominance. Then on the server side Microsoft has finally realized 
> > that they are fighting a losing war. And this is evidenced by the growing 
> > number of MS backed “independent” research groups claiming Windows 
> > server is (pick one, cheaper, better, faster, more secure etc.). Those 
> > tactics speak of desperation. They are a smear campaign plain and simple. 
> > 
> > 
> > Mindshare
> > 
> > This is a good indication of how bad the situation currently is and how 
> > much 
> > worse its going to get. Think about how much of a market share Apple has. 
> > Something like 3% of yearly sales with an install base of about 10-15%. 
> > Now, 
> > think about its mindshare. What is mindshare you ask? Well, its the extent 
> > to which people know about a phenomenon. The iPod has enormous mind share. 
> > You might not own one yourself but chances are you know someone who has 
> > does. The iPod alone has made Apple’s mindshare sky rocket. Now factor in 
> > the ITMS and how profitable it has been. Now think about the recent 
> > announcement of their switch to Intel. And then there is the ever present 
> > rumors about them starting a movie store much like the iTMS. People can’t 
> > stop talking about Apple and Jobs is just fanning the flames, trying his 
> > best to fuel the fires and feed the rumor mills. 
> > 
> > 
> > And all the while the media focuses on Apple do you know who they aren’t 
> > talking about? Microsoft. Think about all of the buzz that MS has gotten in 
> > the past when they released a new operating system. And here they are about 
> > to release an item they claim is their most revolutionary product ever and 
> > . 
> > . . no one is listening. No one cares. Redmond is no longer where all of 
> > the 
> > news is coming from. If you are about to release a killer product, 
> > something 
> > that is going to save your company and allow you to ride its success for 
> > years to come, the last thing you want to hear are yawns. 
> > 
> > 
> > News flash! Longhorn is going to be drastically overshadowed by Leopard and 
> > Macs running Intel. Make no mistake about it, Jobs is a master showman. As 
> > such, he will wait untill the best moment possible and then try and wow the 
> > world with all of Apple’s new toys. Who wants to cover a stripped down, 
> > bare bones, bug infested OS like Longhorn (which is already being called XP 
> > SP3 if that gives you any indication of how bad things are) when you can go 
> > look at Leopard running on a pumped up PowerMac with Intel’s latest and 
> > greatest chip inside? 
> > 
> > 
> > Linux learns to game
> > 
> > 
> > More bad news for MS is called Cedega. And do you know why it is bad? 
> > Because it allows Windows only games to be played on a version of Linux 
> > called Linspire. Uh oh. Thats not good. 
> > 
> > 
> > Gaming is the one area in which Microsoft can truly call their own. No one 
> > really even competes with them on the desktop as far as gaming goes. 
> > Anything else and Apple and Linux can put up a good fight but not when it 
> > comes to games. Until now. With the release of this product Half Life, GTA, 
> > Doom 3 and the rest can now be played in Linux. And if they can do it for 
> > Linux then they can do it for Mac.  And that simple fact should scare the 
> > heck out of Microsoft. Because if that program is ported to OS X then the 
> > top games in the industry can be played on a Mac, using Intel’s fastest 
> > chip, using NVidia’s best graphics card on a 30” aluminum display. Over 
> > night PowerMacs could become the best gaming rig in history. 
> > 
> > 
> > And remember, its gamers who drive companies to produce the best product 
> > possible. Normal people don’t go out and buy the latest and greatest stuff 
> > just because it’s out, gamers do. When you are playing Doom 3 you want it 
> > to be as realistic as possible and if that means buying a $300 video card 
> > then they will do it. If that means buying the fastest processor they will 
> > do it. And if that means upgrading to the newest OS then they will do it. 
> > Say, we don’t know anyone coming out with a new OS any time do we? 
> > 
> > 
> > Realistically how long do you think gamers will stick with Windows if it 
> > turns out that the best gaming experience can be had on a Mac? And if the 
> > rumors are true and Apple does bring AltiVec to the Intel side of things 
> > then it is quite possible that Apple may be the ones who very soon are 
> > producing the fastest computers anywhere. And remember, gamers always want 
> > more power. 
> > 
> > 
> > Women and children first
> > 
> > 
> > Here is my best shot at what Microsoft could do to try and turn things 
> > around: 
> > 
> > 
> > 1. Admit defeat
> > 
> > If only to themselves MS has to admit that Longhorn is a complete and utter 
> > failure. To have come this far, spent this much money and wasted this much 
> > time to ultimately produce an OS which barely has any of the features that 
> > was to make it great, is a beyond pathetic. Time to own up to the fact that 
> > everybody screwed up. 
> > 
> > 
> > 2. Thin the herd
> > 
> > First one out the door needs to be Ballmer. He is an idiot on a good day 
> > and 
> > he has just reinforced that image with his bungling of the Longhorn 
> > situation. After he goes then its time to go down the line trimming the fat 
> > and doing some serious house cleaning. Once that is done then look outside 
> > the company for a few decent managers. 
> > 
> > 
> > 3. Do your best
> > 
> > Since Longhorn is the only thing you got at the moment that is what they 
> > are 
> > going to have to sell. Try to make the best out of a bad situation. This is 
> > the point at which you should be treading water while you work on something 
> > else. 
> > 
> > 
> > 4. Dump it
> > 
> > Throw all of the current Windows code away. All of it. Everything from 9x 
> > to 
> > XP to Longhorn, everything has to go. It’s all crap and its time to 
> > jettison those reeking piles of poorly written, buggy code. 
> > 
> > 
> > 5. Start over
> > 
> > This may be the hardest pill of all to swallow but the way I see it they 
> > have two choices. Plan A, try and make a new OS from the ground up. Just 
> > like the people who designed Unix, security and stability have to be your 
> > main goals. But that approach is going to take time, a lot of time in fact. 
> > And time is something that MS doesn’t have much of right now. So, they 
> > might want to look at plan B. Plan B involves doing pretty much what Apple 
> > did. Use BSD as the core of your OS then build around it. Now, I realize 
> > that doing this would be a major embarrassment and would require the 
> > biggest 
> > software company on earth to swallow its pride, but ultimately they would 
> > see that it’s the best choice. 
> > 
> > 
> > 6. Decouple
> > 
> > There is no need to make IE so deeply attached to your kernel. Bad things 
> > happen when you do stuff like that. Same thing with Media Player, uncouple 
> > it. Strive to make the system as small as possible. You build the basic 
> > system and then offer pieces that can be attached as needed. 
> > 
> > 
> > 7. Move on
> > 
> > It’s time to tell the public that if they want to use the newest 
> > applications for then they need to upgrade. Everyone who still uses 98 has 
> > to get real. All of you still using 95 need your head examined. And any of 
> > you using ME, God help you. Microsoft needs to stand up and inform people 
> > that they will no longer bend over backwards to accommodate their old, 
> > clunky, piece of crap software. Its time to update all of your 
> > applications. 
> > 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP and Longhorn are dead, move on. That step alone would 
> > make the OS much smaller, faster and more secure. 
> > 
> > 
> > 8. Accept the losses
> > 
> > Microsoft is going to lose market share no matter what they do. If they 
> > followed this strategy then they would lose market share faster than if 
> > they 
> > stuck it out with Longhorn but in a few years they would be in a much 
> > better 
> > position to come back and reclaim what they had lost. 
> > 
> > 
> > Wrapping it up
> > 
> > 
> > So, there you have it. The current state of the Longhorn, a prediction of 
> > things to come and a few hints for the folks in Redmond. It will be fun to 
> > watch what happens in the industry in the next few years. We will see if I 
> > am right. What do you think? What did I miss? 
> > 
> > 
> > Update
> > 
> > Since I have received so many comments that seem to dwell on the same point 
> > let me clarify my position.  I don’t think Microsoft is going to go 
> > anywhere soon.  However, I do think that they are on the downturn.  They 
> > have reached their peak and now they are in decline.  It will take a long 
> > time for their influence to fade (a decade at least) and for a good part of 
> > that time they will still be a force to be reconded with.  But that still 
> > doesn’t change the fact that, as a company, they are falling instead of 
> > rising. 
> > 
> > 
> > Check out my views on all of Microsoft’s business endeavors (present and 
> > future) here: 
> > 
> > Microsoft’s Future Prospects
> > 
> > http://www.applematters.com/index.php/423/
> > 
-- 
David Zakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to