Anyone else get this? Duh, of course my ISP blocked those emails, they were spam!
Judah University of Maryland LISTSERV Server (14.4) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:14 > > You have been automatically removed from the UM-LINUX list (UM Linux > User's Group) as a result of repeated delivery error reports from your > mail system. This decision was based on the automatic error monitoring > policy in effect for the list, and has not been reviewed or otherwise > confirmed by a human being. If you receive this message, it means that > something is wrong: while you are obviously able to receive mail, your > mail system has been regularly reporting that your account did not exist, > or that you were otherwise permanently unable to receive mail. Here is > some information which may assist you or your local help desk in > determining the cause of the problem: > > - The failing address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - The first error was reported on 2006-02-14. > > - Since then, a total of 3 delivery errors have been received. > > - The last reported error was: 5.7.1 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin > > PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE THIS MESSAGE. While you can of course re-subscribe > to the list, it is important for you to report this problem to your mail > administrator so that it can be solved. This problem is not specific to > the UM-LINUX list, and also affects your private mail. This means that > YOU HAVE PROBABLY LOST SOME PRIVATE MAIL AS WELL. Anyone trying to write > to you during the same time frame will probably have received the same > errors for the same reason. The UM-LINUX list is but one of the many > people who may have tried to write to you while your mail system was > malfunctioning. > > DO NOT LET TECHNICAL PEOPLE CONVINCE YOU THAT THIS IS NORMAL. It is never > normal for a mail system to claim that a valid, working account does not > exist, just as it would not be normal for the post office to return some > of your mail with "addressee unknown" when the address was written > correctly. It is true that some mail systems are less reliable than > others, and your technical people may be doing the best they can with the > tools they have. But, ultimately, the level of service that you are > receiving is the result of a business decision, and not something due to > a universal technical limitation that one can only accept. Reliable mail > systems do exist, and it is ultimately up to you to decide whether this > level of service is acceptable or not.
