~John
On 5/25/06, John Demme <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In response to several people,
I think I've just set it to have me moderate non-member postings. The documentation kinda sucks, so we'll see if I did it right.
~JohnOn 5/25/06, Aloomis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Can the list be set to moderate nonmember postings? If someone doesn't
mind moderating the amount of spam we've been receiving lately, this
would give us the best of both worlds.
Thus said John Demme ( [EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thu, May 25, 2006 at 03:05:54PM -0400:
> I haven't seen (m)?any legitimate postings from non-subscribers in a long
> time, so clearly possible new members are not taking advantage of this
> openness to the rest of the list's detriment. I would like to let it remain
> open, but the amount of spam that gets through degrades the list too much.
> If you look at the May archives page, the majority of the top ten emails are
> spam.
>
> ~John
>
> On 5/25/06, Carlos Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >So... what happened to the "business decisions" made in "the past" thar
> >argued that making the list members-only was raising the barrier for entry
> >to new members?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 5/25/06, John Demme < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Due to the recent spam coming through the list, I have changed the
> >> settings such that only list subscribers may post to the list, so if you
> >> want to post make sure you're posting from the email address which the
> >list
> >> sends messages to.
> >>
> >> ~John Demme
> >>
> >
> >
--
Public key available at:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x192565D4
Key fingerprint: EF38 363A 7FA1 5E40 712E 1511 7B1B 337A 1925 65D4
