I would say (IMHO) that if your presentation is four hours, breaking it into
at least two, two hour chunks is wise.
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Quigley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Joe Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 9:56 AM
Subject: Re: [UM-LINUX] Red Hat Follow-Up: Make SELinux Easier
Ok. I am still working on the information gathering stages for what is
going into the presentation and what excercises to create for the
audience. If anyone has any questions they want answered in this feel
free to reply to this thread with them and I'll build them into the
tutorial. I have the fortune of getting to do this at work and getting
paid for it so the quality of it should be very high. I will also be
making the kickstart and revisor files available for anyone who wants
to rebuild the live CD once they are done.
How long are the LUG meetings usually? I requested a 4 hour time slot
for this at OLS (even though I haven't heard back from them yet). If
the meetings are two hours perhaps I could split it into basic/admin
level stuff and then advanced/programmer stuff.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Joe Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a bona-fide SELinux noob (actually... I'm even a noob wannabe!) so,
not
only would I be interested, I promise to ask lots of questions!
Joe
----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Quigley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 2:43 AM
Subject: Re: [UM-LINUX] Red Hat Follow-Up: Make SELinux Easier
> I know this response is to an e-mail that is quite old but would
> anyone be interested in an SELinux Talk/Tutorial? I might be giving
> one at the Ottawa Linux Symposium in July and it would be nice to give
> it a shot on a willing set of participants before then. I haven't
> finished it yet but I am working on a F9 Live CD with all the
> necessary SELinux utils and policy development packages installed to
> use as a nice convenient base for the tutorial. It will also have all
> the materials on it so that if anyone wants to take the CD and give
> another presentation with it all they have to do is pop it in, boot it
> up, and they are good to go.
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Ben Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 04:54:11PM -0400, Shawn Wells wrote:
> > > Joe Murphy wrote:
> > >> After looking at the screen shot you linked to... I wonder if that
> > >> command is shown in a place that it could be copy/pasted or
> > >> whether
it
> > >> would have to be replicated by hand... hmmm..
> > > I'd assume copy/pasted, the way it's in the setroubleshoot tool
> > > now.
> > > I'd imagine that one could create a PolicyKit policy to allow
> > > "Super
> > > Users" to run the tool as root, and apply the changes through a
button.
> >
> > Also, one of the few clear benefits of the new GTK+ 2 widgetsets is
> > that
> > labels can be made selectable, so if the text in those screenshots is
not
> > selectable in the final version of the tool, it's definitely going to
> > be
a
> > bug in the offing.
> >
> > Ben
> > --
> > Ben Stern UNIX & Networks Monkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > This post does not represent FTI, even if I claim it does. Neener
neener.
> > UM Linux Users' Group Electromagnetic Networks Microbrew
Software
> >
> >
>
