Juanjo Pablos <jua...@apertus.es> wrote on 05/11/2011 05:53:03 PM:
> El 11/05/11 22:16, Timothy J Massey escribió:
> > Juanjo Pablos <jua...@apertus.es> wrote on 05/07/2011 03:58:45 AM:
> >
> > > ok,
> > > I have compiled another version but just using linux config on
> > version 3092:
> > >
> > > <URL Redacted> can you check if that works
> > fine
> > > on your systems?
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. That CD fails. How is it different?
> >
> ok,
> Just to be sure.. The previous CD was build using a old version of
> linux-config for version 2.6.29 and accepting all the default options,
> This one was build using the revision 3092 of that file you can see them
> all here:
>
>
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/log/trunk/linuxboot/
> misc/linux-config
There are *lots* of changes between the working one (2964) and the one you
used (3092):
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/unattended/changeset?new=3092%40trunk%2Flinuxboot%2Fmisc%2Flinux-config&old=2985%40trunk%2Flinuxboot%2Fmisc%2Flinux-config
> So if I am correct there is a change from r2964 to r3092 that make a
> opps on your systems. I will try to build up a version for you to test..
> it will take a while sorry...
In the meantime, I will start with a git-bisect-style process. As you can
see, I'm building kernel 2.6.38.5:
[root@openinstall linuxboot]# grep ^linux= Makefile
linux=linux-2.6.38.5
First, download config version 3068:
[root@openinstall linuxboot]# svn up -r 3068 misc/linux-config
U misc/linux-config
Updated to revision 3068.
I build a CD, and hold down the <ENTER> key for a while when it's running
Kconfig...
(I also have to do my magic to make DOSEMU compile. Is there a way to
remove this from the Makefile completely? I'm not even using it!)
Boot it on all three machine types I have and it works! So, next config:
3089. It too works! However, 3090 *FAILS*.
I have attached the two resulting .config files. Something in the diff
between these is killing me. Unfortunately, there are a *lot* of changes
between them, which seems odd for a .config that's just minutes newer than
the other one...
[Edit: The .config files are not attached. Too big for the mailing list.
I'm sure you can compare them without me attaching them.]
Thoughts on what I should change from here?
Again, thank you very much for your help! I look forward to any
suggestions you might have.
Timothy J. Massey
Out of the Box Solutions, Inc.
Creative IT Solutions Made Simple!
http://www.OutOfTheBoxSolutions.com
tmas...@obscorp.com
22108 Harper Ave.
St. Clair Shores, MI 48080
Office: (800)750-4OBS (4627)
Cell: (586)945-8796
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools
to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________
unattended-devel mailing list
unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel
