"Special Chat List for \"To Understand: New Horizons in Reading 
Comprehension\"" <[email protected]> writes:
>I do think we need to teach main idea as a text structure.  I know from my own 
>reading of my grad school text books that there is often a main idea of the 
>text.  Perhaps it takes the forms of a central idea with examples to follow or 
>maybe a series of
>iddeas where the reader has to infer a bigger idea from it.  But I do 
>recognize main idea as a form of text structure often in my own reading.  
>It sounds to me that this is different from the strategy of determining 
>importance.  At one of Stephanie Harvey's workshops, she spoke of an activity 
>were the kids read a short nonfiction article and afterwards wrote what THEY 
>thought was most important
>Ito remember and then what did they think the AUTHOR wanted them to remember.  
>I think this addresses Ellin's point that we, as readers, might not always 
>agree with the author's "main idea" because of what we bring to the text.
>In my mind, these are 2 separate issues.  One is looking at the structure of 
>the text and the other is looking at the meaning of the text.
>Dana

I agree with Dana and Elllin that we may not always agree with the author's 
main idea and that as critical readers, we need to develop our own thinking. I 
also agree  that main idea and text structures are two different things.  I 
believe you may be
thinking of the structure most often refereed to as description when mentioning 
the Scholastic News etc. Other non fiction text structures include 
cause/effect, compare/contrast, sequencing, problem/solution. The reader needs 
to take in the information
from the text and organize the facts in order to gain a better understanding. 
While writing, the writer needs to organize the text according to one or more 
of these structures.
MJ


_______________________________________________
Understand mailing list
[email protected]
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/listinfo/understand_literacyworkshop.org

Reply via email to