Re: Tamil glyphs

[Rick McGowan]

"Michael (michka) Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> There is one thing missing in the Unicode Standard, and it can be
> found in #5 on ligatures (unchanged from Unicode 2.0). The behavior
> described there is only one of *two* desired possibilities.

This is starting to sound like a deficiency in the block intro -- something that 
should be documented more clearly, if there are indeed to common represenetations that 
are desired.

Can you expound upon precisely what the problem is, as you perceive it?

Thanks,
        Rick