Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogate space in

[Peter_Constable]

On 02/20/2001 12:33:04 PM John Hudson wrote:

>The only thing that I insist on is that we maintain the distinction
between
>Roman and roman.

Which is?


>I wonder though, Peter, about your suggestion that '"Latin script" is less
>acceptable since "Latin" suggests something constrained to the language
>Latin'. Couldn't the same thing be said about 'Arabic script'?

Probably. I was just trying to nit-pick back at the nit-pickers. :-)



- Peter


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485
E-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>