[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In a message dated 2001-02-20 09:53:50 Pacific Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > An alphabet is a type of writing system, something that is implemented for > > a particular language. Certainly Latin is the name of a language while > > Roman is not, and so "Latin alphabet" is correct while "Roman alphabet" > > would not be. > > Counterexample: The "Cyrillic" script is used to write Russian, Bulgarian, > Serbian, Ukrainian, etc. This is an especially useful term precisely because > there is no "Cyrillic" language, and so the term does not favor any one > language over others. In practice, though, just as the "Latin alphabet" actually means the English alphabet, the "Cyrillic alphabet" most often refers to the Russian alphabet. -- Erland Sommarskog, Stockholm, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Michael Everson
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Antoine Leca
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Erland Sommarskog
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... DougEwell2

