In a message dated 2001-02-20 09:53:50 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > An alphabet is a type of writing system, something that is implemented for > a particular language. Certainly Latin is the name of a language while > Roman is not, and so "Latin alphabet" is correct while "Roman alphabet" > would not be. Counterexample: The "Cyrillic" script is used to write Russian, Bulgarian, Serbian, Ukrainian, etc. This is an especially useful term precisely because there is no "Cyrillic" language, and so the term does not favor any one language over others. Still picking nits, -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Surrogat... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... J%ORG KNAPPEN
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Antoine Leca
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Antoine Leca
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... John Cowan
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... DougEwell2
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Peter_Constable
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Tex Texin
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Michael Everson
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Antoine Leca
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... Erland Sommarskog
- Re: Perception that Unicode is 16-bit (was: Re: Sur... DougEwell2

