At 6:28 AM -0800 2/23/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >The unlikelihood of you or anybody coming up with sufficient >evidence to make that case is such that I'd be willing to put less >constraint on you: present clear evidence that more than 880,790 characters >will *ever* be in wide use and will merit standardization on this planet. > I believe that recent evidence shows conclusively that the Phaistos disk is a written in a syllabic script that requires 1,234,567 unique precomposed symbols. :-) -- ===== John H. Jenkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://homepage.mac.com/jenkins/
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Kenneth Whistler
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael \(michka\) Kaplan
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- RE: fictional scripts revisited John H. Jenkins
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Ayers, Mike
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Daniel Biddle
- Re: fictional scripts revisited David Starner
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Curtis Clark
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable
- RE: fictional scripts revisited Christopher John Fynn
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Joel Rees
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Michael Everson
- Re: fictional scripts revisited Peter_Constable

